Who did it III
[My Australasia]
What another conspiracy theory Im discovered on the net. Its will doubt us with another queries.... Just a few early questions on that 'Brits breed suicide bombers'.
1. Why would suicide bombers need timers? Are we to believe that all four of them died when they mistakenly set off their bombs?
2. Why would suicide bombers carry identification which would lead the authorities directly to their colleagues? How did it survive in at least three of the bombs? I am reminded of the convenient passport found at the World Trade Center.
3. If all four video cameras on the bus were not working, how do the police know what happened on the bus? The witness who saw someone fiddling with a bag just begs the question of whether the fiddler was a bomber. Why do video cameras on buses need to be switched on by the drivers?
4. Why did Jack Straw state so quickly that it was al Qaeda? Is the theory that it is still al Qaeda, or some other group?
5. How did the British know to warn Netanyahu so quickly? If they knew enough to warn Netanyahu, why didn't they have enough time to shut down the subway system? Or did they?
6. Why was the transportation system still operating when the bus bomb went off, nearly an hour later than the subway bombs? One theory is that the last bomber got on the bus after the subway system was closed!
7. How easy would it be to pay some Muslim British men, who are told to carry identification, to drive to London and sit in specific places on specific subway trains or buses? When the bombs go off and the identification is found, you have instant patsies, and British Muslims in the frame. The fact they were seen together on video footage then becomes just part of the set-up. With so many known video cameras in London, why wouldn't they take care not to be seen together? They could have entered London separately if they did not want to be identified as part of a 'cell', and avoid giving the police information that could be used to trace their colleagues. As is often the case with these stories, we are asked to believe that they would be technically proficient ('military grade' explosives), but make the dumbest small mistakes.
8. What happened to the story, out of Canada and New Zealand, that the police shot one or two men near Canary Wharf?
To complete this question to be nine [a must at Ninetnine Network]... so additional question from me as a curious person as usual... pls answer, if there's any.
9. What they really die for, fight for or what their main intention for this entire remarkable action. For what for as simple as that... Why we didn't highlight that for finding the answer for all the questions.
Related post:
Who did it II
Who did it
Ps: Happy nice weekend mate. Will back for another new sem. See yaa.
What another conspiracy theory Im discovered on the net. Its will doubt us with another queries.... Just a few early questions on that 'Brits breed suicide bombers'.
1. Why would suicide bombers need timers? Are we to believe that all four of them died when they mistakenly set off their bombs?
2. Why would suicide bombers carry identification which would lead the authorities directly to their colleagues? How did it survive in at least three of the bombs? I am reminded of the convenient passport found at the World Trade Center.
3. If all four video cameras on the bus were not working, how do the police know what happened on the bus? The witness who saw someone fiddling with a bag just begs the question of whether the fiddler was a bomber. Why do video cameras on buses need to be switched on by the drivers?
4. Why did Jack Straw state so quickly that it was al Qaeda? Is the theory that it is still al Qaeda, or some other group?
5. How did the British know to warn Netanyahu so quickly? If they knew enough to warn Netanyahu, why didn't they have enough time to shut down the subway system? Or did they?
6. Why was the transportation system still operating when the bus bomb went off, nearly an hour later than the subway bombs? One theory is that the last bomber got on the bus after the subway system was closed!
7. How easy would it be to pay some Muslim British men, who are told to carry identification, to drive to London and sit in specific places on specific subway trains or buses? When the bombs go off and the identification is found, you have instant patsies, and British Muslims in the frame. The fact they were seen together on video footage then becomes just part of the set-up. With so many known video cameras in London, why wouldn't they take care not to be seen together? They could have entered London separately if they did not want to be identified as part of a 'cell', and avoid giving the police information that could be used to trace their colleagues. As is often the case with these stories, we are asked to believe that they would be technically proficient ('military grade' explosives), but make the dumbest small mistakes.
8. What happened to the story, out of Canada and New Zealand, that the police shot one or two men near Canary Wharf?
To complete this question to be nine [a must at Ninetnine Network]... so additional question from me as a curious person as usual... pls answer, if there's any.
9. What they really die for, fight for or what their main intention for this entire remarkable action. For what for as simple as that... Why we didn't highlight that for finding the answer for all the questions.
Related post:
Ps: Happy nice weekend mate. Will back for another new sem. See yaa.
posted by 9T9 at
7:02 pm
<< Home